EVIDENCE CARD · NCT05950945 · Breast cancer landscape
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (Enhertu, T-DXd) in HER2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer
A multicenter global Phase 3b rollover trial (Daiichi Sankyo / AstraZeneca) providing access to T-DXd for patients with HR-negative and HR-positive HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who have exhausted approved options and require continued treatment while awaiting reimbursement or local approval.
Evidence: High
Phase 3b, N = 250, open-label rollover, recruiting since July 2023, 88 sites in 15+ countries (US 5 sites). The core evidence supporting T-DXd in HER2-low breast is Level I randomized: DESTINY-Breast04 (Modi NEJM 2022, N=557, mPFS 10.1 vs 5.4 mo HR 0.51, mOS 23.9 vs 17.5 mo HR 0.64) and DESTINY-Breast06 (Bardia NEJM 2024, N=866 HR+ HER2-low/ultralow post-endocrine, mPFS 12.9-14 vs 6.5-8.2 mo). FDA-approved for HER2-low mBC since Aug 2022; label expanded Jan 2025 to include HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with faint staining). Primary completion for this rollover: Oct 2027.
⚠ Critical safety signal — interstitial lung disease (ILD) / pneumonitis. Adjudicated drug-related ILD occurred in 12.1% of DESTINY-Breast04 patients (0.8% grade 5, i.e. fatal) and 13.6% (2.2% grade 5) in the earlier HER2-positive DESTINY-Breast01 population. Consider T-DXd only with pulmonary monitoring and immediate steroid protocols on suspected ILD. This is not a reason to avoid T-DXd — it is a reason to demand active surveillance.
Evidence supporting T-DXd in HER2-low breast cancer
Pivotal (Level I, randomized vs standard chemotherapy)
-
Pivotal Ph3 HR-neg + HR-pos HER2-low DESTINY-Breast04 — T-DXd vs Physician's Choice Chemo in HER2-Low mBCRandomized (2:1)557 (494 HR+ / 63 HR-)HR+ mPFS10.1 vs 5.4 mo (HR 0.51, p<0.001)HR+ mOS23.9 vs 17.5 mo (HR 0.64, p=0.003)All-patient mPFS9.9 vs 5.1 mo (HR 0.50)All-patient mOS23.4 vs 16.8 mo (HR 0.64, p=0.001)Grade ≥3 TRAE52.6% vs 67.4%ILD / pneumonitis12.1% (0.8% grade 5)Population1-2 prior chemo lines
-
Pivotal Ph3 Extended to ultralow, first-line-post-endocrine DESTINY-Breast06 — T-DXd vs TPC in HR+ HER2-Low or HER2-Ultralow mBC After EndocrineRandomized (1:1)866 HR+ HER2-low/ultralowmPFS12.9-14.0 vs 6.5-8.2 mo (across subgroups)Confirmed ORR36.7-67.7% vs 16.7-37.5%PopulationPost-ET+CDK4/6i, chemo-naive in mBC settingUltralow subgroupPFS benefit consistent with HER2-lowSafetyNo new signals vs DB04 (ILD comparable)
Foundational (single-arm HER2-positive proof-of-concept)
-
Foundational Ph2 DESTINY-Breast01 — T-DXd in Heavily Pretreated HER2-Positive mBCPatients184 (median 6 prior therapies)Confirmed ORR60.9% (95% CI 53.4-68.0)Median DoR14.8 moMedian PFS16.4 moGrade ≥3 neutropenia20.7%ILD / pneumonitis13.6% (2.2% grade 5)
Regulatory
-
Approved · FDA T-DXd (Enhertu) — HER2-low mBC approval, August 2022Approved for unresectable or metastatic HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) breast cancer in adults who have received a prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or developed disease recurrence during or within 6 months of completing adjuvant chemotherapy.
-
Label expanded · FDA HER2-ultralow T-DXd label extended to HER2-Ultralow HR+ mBC, January 2025Approved for unresectable or metastatic HR+ HER2-low or HER2-ultralow breast cancer whose disease has progressed on one or more endocrine therapies in the metastatic setting.
Timeline — T-DXd in breast cancer
2019 Dec
First pivotal readout — DESTINY-Breast01, HER2+ pretreated, ORR 60.9% (NEJM 2020, PMID 31825192)
2019 Dec
FDA accelerated approval — HER2+ mBC, ≥2 prior anti-HER2 lines
2022 Jun
DESTINY-Breast04 readout — the HER2-low landmark, mPFS HR 0.51, mOS HR 0.64 vs chemo (NEJM 2022, PMID 35665782)
2022 Aug
FDA HER2-low approval — first-ever HER2-low label in oncology; creates the diagnostic tier and the market
2023 Jul
NCT05950945 registered — global Phase 3b rollover for HR-neg + HR-pos HER2-low, N=250
2024 Sep
DESTINY-Breast06 readout — extends to HR+ HER2-low/ultralow post-endocrine, N=866 (NEJM 2024, PMID 39282896)
2025 Jan
FDA label expansion — HER2-ultralow HR+ mBC after endocrine therapy; new diagnostic tier
2026 Jun
DESTINY-Breast06 subgroup analyses — PFS benefit consistent across TTP-on-CDK4/6i, disease burden, endocrine resistance (Ann Oncol 2026, PMID 41780642)
2027 Oct
NCT05950945 expected primary completion
How this strength score was computed
| Dimension | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Study design | High | Two independent Level I randomized Phase 3 RCTs (DB04, DB06) vs standard chemotherapy, both positive on both PFS and OS/interim OS. Foundational Ph2 single-arm (DB01) for HER2+ safety anchor. |
| Sample size | High | Randomized N = 557 (DB04) + 866 (DB06) = 1,423 patients across the two pivotal trials. Comfortably powered for the HR+ HER2-low subgroup. |
| Follow-up maturity | High | Both pivotals have mature OS readouts, not interim-only. HR is stable across follow-up updates. |
| Source quality | High | Two NEJM primary papers + Ann Oncol subgroup + Daiichi/AZ sponsor + FDA approvals in two label-expansion rounds. |
| Endpoint quality | High | Blinded independent central review PFS + OS in both pivotals (gold-standard endpoints). This rollover uses TTNT (time-to-next-therapy) as its own primary — a real-world-usage endpoint, not a substitute for the pivotals. |
| Consistency | High | PFS/OS benefit consistent across HR+/HR-, HER2-low/ultralow, prior-therapy subgroups. Only outlier is HER2-null (IHC 0 without faint staining) — efficacy uncertain, deliberately excluded from the label. |
Limitations of this evidence base:
- NCT05950945 itself is a rollover / expanded-access Phase 3b, not a randomized comparison. Its N=250 is small vs the pivotals it draws on; its role is continued access, not new evidence.
- Efficacy in HER2-null (IHC 0, no faint membrane staining) tumors remains uncertain. The DAISY trial suggested some activity even at very low HER2 expression, but regulatory eligibility currently requires detectable staining. Diagnostic-assay variability at the HER2-low/ultralow/null boundary is a real clinical problem (see Torlakovic Curr Oncol 2026, PMID 42041700).
- ILD/pneumonitis remains the dose-limiting toxicity: 12.1% in DB04 (0.8% grade 5), 13.6% in DB01 (2.2% grade 5). Any new cough, dyspnea, or fever needs immediate imaging + steroid protocol. Do NOT delay evaluation.
- All pivotals used the Ventana 4B5 IHC assay as companion diagnostic. Patients tested with the legacy Dako HercepTest may need reassessment before eligibility — ~60% discordance rate documented in one MD Anderson series (Yamaguchi Breast Cancer Res Treat 2026, PMID 42329461); ~1/4 of discordant cases lose HER2-low status.
- The Phase 3b rollover has 88 sites but only 5 in the US; patient discoverability in the US is best via the pivotal trials' registered sites or standard commercial-supply T-DXd (which is FDA-approved and reimbursable).
Are you or a loved one considering T-DXd for HER2-low breast cancer? Get a personalized ranked list of breast-cancer trials you may qualify for — free, no login.
Find Matching Breast Cancer Trials